This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Landau, W.M. Articles by Wiggs, J.W. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Landau, W.M. Articles by Wiggs, J.W. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Neuroreality I. Dedicated Demolition of the Decade of the Brain: The Genuine Threat to Neurologic Research From the Animal Radical Right

Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO

J.R. Daube, MD

Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN

M.J. Aminoff, MD

Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, CA

R.L. Brey, MD

Department of Medicine (Neurology), University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX

B.R. Brooks, MD

Neurology Service, William S. Middleton Memorial VA Hospital, Madison, WI

R.K. Deuel, MD

Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, Department of Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO

A.M. Galaburda, MD

Behavioral Neurology, Unit Beth Israel Hospital, Boston, MA

J.A. Porter, MD

R.B. Rosenbaum, MD

R.H. Whitham, MD

Department of Neurology, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, OR

J.W. Wiggs, MD

In this era of budgetary constraints, the biggest threat to continuing biomedical research is often seen as governmental funding cutbacks. However, a much larger threat looms—the antiscientific programs of the various so-called animal rights groups. Unless clinicians and scientists mount a concerted defense of scientific investigation, the repressive antiscience movement will win out and thrust us into a Dark Ages scenario, with only a few gallant enough to maintain scientific thought until another Enlightenment. During World War II, the German clergyman Martin Niemoeller lamented the general apathy that allowed a small group of dedicated ideologues (the Nazi hierarchy) to terrorize the Germans: "In Germany they came first for the Communists, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Communist. Then they came for the Jews, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Jew. Then they came for the trade unionists, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a trade unionist. Then they came for the Catholics, and I didn't speak up because I was a Protestant. Then they came for me, and by that time no one was left to speak up." Not dissimilarly, the apathy of clinicians and biomedical scientists has permitted the radical animal rights movement to terrorize researchers and undermine our research freedom. In a call to action, the American Academy of Neurology has developed a statement (in association with the Foundation for Biomedical Research and other groups) on the threat to neurology research. This information was originally published in Neurology (1995;45: 609-610). In order to increase the dissemination of this important warning to clinicians and scientists everywhere, the Journal of Child Neurology in cooperation with the American Academy of Neurology is reprinting that material in this issue.

Journal of Child Neurology, Vol. 10, No. 5, 343-345 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/088307389501000501


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?