This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Ouvrier, R. Articles by Black, F. H. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Ouvrier, R. Articles by Black, F. H. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

SYSTEMS: School-Years Screening Test for the Evaluation of Mental Status

New Children's Hospital at Westmead Sydney, roberto{at}nch.edu.au, University of Sydney Sydney, Australia

Julie Hendy, BBeh Sci (Hons), MSc

New Children's Hospital at Westmead Sydney

Laurel Bornholt, BA (Hons), PhD

University of Sydney Sydney, Australia

Fiona H. Black, BA

New Children's Hospital at Westmead Sydney, University of Sydney Sydney, Australia

This paper introduces the School-Years Screening Test for Evaluation of Mental Status (SYSTEMS). It was designed to be used by neurologists, pediatricians, and other health professionals assessing children with suspected cognitive problems or changes. SYSTEMS was initially based on the adult Mini-Mental State Examination developed by Folstein, Folstein, and McHugh in 1975. SYSTEMS is a 7- to 12-minute, one-on-one interview test containing 46 items for use in children between 5 and 12 years of age. Although a full diagnosis cannot be made, the results do provide an indication of whether to send a child for further detailed cognitive assessment. The development of SYSTEMS comprised seven studies with a total of 1207 children involved from Sydney primary schools and neurology clinics of the New Children's Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia. All children were administered the SYSTEMS. Some of the children also were administered the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Test, 4th edition, or the Differential Ability Scales. Results showed that the SYSTEMS was internally consistent, unbiased by sex, socioeconomic indicators, or language groups; discriminated well by age; and strongly correlated (r = 0.88) with mental age. No significant differences in results obtained by two trained administrators were evident and no indication of apparent practice effect was found. The SYSTEMS was found to have desirable levels of sensitivity (83% and 92%), specificity (76% and 95%), and likelihood ratio for cognitive impairment (3.63 and 17.5) when compared with neurologic judgments and the Differential Ability Scales, respectively. (J Child Neurol 1999; 14:772-780).

Journal of Child Neurology, Vol. 14, No. 12, 772-780 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/088307389901401202


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. J. Bornholt, F. H. Spencer, I. H. Fisher, and R. A. Ouvrier Cognitive Screening for Young Children: Development and Diversity in Learning Contexts J Child Neurol, May 1, 2004; 19(5): 313 - 317. [Abstract] [PDF]

				F. H. Spencer, L. J. Bornholt, and R. A. Ouvrier Test Reliability and Stability of Children's Cognitive Functioning J Child Neurol, January 1, 2003; 18(1): 5 - 11. [Abstract] [PDF]