Journal of Child Neurology

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/childneurology

Click here for free access to the SAGE eReference platform!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Percy, A. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Percy, A. K.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Child Neurology, Vol. 14, No. 4, 256-262 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/088307389901400408

Inherited Neurodegenerative Disease: The Evolution of Our Thinking

Alan K. Percy, MD

Departments of Pediatrics and Neurology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL

The past 3 decades have witnessed impressive progress in our understanding of inherited neurometabolic diseases, promoted by the rapid development and application of molecular genetic strategies. Such progress has required the juxtaposition of clinical evaluations and basic science techniques. The central role of careful and complete assessment of affected children cannot be overemphasized and in no way has been diminished by technologic advances. Indeed, enhanced clinical and laboratory evaluations have led to important conceptual advances. Molecular genetics has elucidated those disorders with known metabolic defects through functional cloning and explained the variability of disease expression based on specific mutational events. Alternatively, positional cloning has identified molecular defects for those disorders with clear phenotypic patterns, but lacking a defined metabolic abnormality. Regarding heterogeneous expression, disorders with clearly different phenotypes can arise from different mutations within the same gene. The multiple variants of ß-hexosaminidase deficiency (Tay-Sachs disease) are, arguably, the best examples. Conversely, disorders with similar phenotypes are explainable by quite different mutational events. In addition, the identification of specific diseases exhibiting both biochemical abnormalities and disturbed organogenesis has blurred conventional dogma regarding separation of genetic disorders into strict metabolic and structural categories. Disorders of peroxisomal function and the neuronal ceroid lipofuscinoses are prototypes for the points noted above and raise important issues regarding our approaches to children with these disorders. These issues include a high index of suspicion for an inherited neurometabolic disease and an open mind to possible interrelations with other known and seemingly dissimilar conditions. (J Child Neurol 1999;14:256-262).


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?