This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Wilmshurst, J. M. Articles by Robinson, R. O. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Wilmshurst, J. M. Articles by Robinson, R. O. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Positron Emission Tomography in Imaging Spinal Cord Tumors

Department of Paediatric Neurology, Guy's Hospital, mhjmw{at}mweb.co.za

Sally F. Barrington, MRCP

Clinical PET Centre, Guy's Hospital and St Thomas' Hospital

Dylan Pritchard, BSc (Hons)

Clinical PET Centre, Guy's Hospital and St Thomas' Hospital

Tim Cox, FRCR

Department of Neuroradiology, Guy's Hospital

Peter Bullock, FRCS

Neurosurgical Department, King's College Hospital, London, UK

Michael Maisey, MD

Clinical PET Centre, Guy's Hospital and St Thomas' Hospital

Richard O. Robinson, FRCPCH

Department of Paediatric Neurology, Guy's Hospital

The ability of positron emission tomography (PET) to detect spinal cord tumors was studied prospectively in 14 patients presenting over a 5-year period. Abnormal uptake by [ ¹⁸F]-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) or ¹¹C-methionine was detected in all except one. These data were assessed in relation to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings with regard to tumor type and extent preoperatively, findings at operation, and subsequent clinical course. The group consisted of six astrocytomas, five ependymomas, one mixed ependymoma and astrocytoma, one schwannoma, and one ganglioglioma, all confirmed histologically. This is the largest study comparing spinal PET to MRI. Accurate preoperative correlation between PET and MRI was found in all eight patients scanned at first presentation. The PET uptake was in keeping with the low-grade histology of the tumors. Postoperatively, PET and MRI findings were in agreement in nine patients. In eight of these the findings were in keeping with the subsequent clinical course. In three patients, however, the PET findings were at variance with the clinical course and MRI findings. In one, persistent FDG uptake after radiotherapy was seen where there was subsequent tumor resolution. In two patients with low-grade astrocytomas, scanned with FDG and ¹¹C-methionine, respectively, tracer was not taken up by residual tumor. In this small group of patients, PET did not provide additional useful information. This could be because all tumors studied were low grade and the limited spatial resolution of PET does not lend itself to imaging small spinal cord tumors. The prospective study of larger numbers of patients with a wider range of tumor types is required, but this might be difficult to achieve given the rarity of spinal cord tumors. (J Child Neurol 2000;15:465-472).

Journal of Child Neurology, Vol. 15, No. 7, 465-472 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/088307380001500708


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?