This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (4) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Samsom, J. F. Articles by de Groot, L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Samsom, J. F. Articles by de Groot, L. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Study of a Group of Extremely Preterm Infants (25—27 Weeks)

How Do They Function at 1 Year of Age?

Department of Pediatrics, Vrije Universiteit Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, J.Samsom{at}azvu.nl

Laila de Groot, MCSPPhD

Department of Pediatrics, Vrije Universiteit Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Faculty of Human Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

The functional outcome of 49 extremely preterm infants (gestational age: 25—27 weeks) was studied at the corrected age of 12 months. Apart from pediatric follow-up, a full neurologic assessment and the Bayley Motor and Mental Scales of Infant Development was done. Emphasis was placed on postural control, spontaneous motility, hand function, and elicited infantile reactions. Special attention was given to symmetric development. The infants were then categorized as having optimal or nonoptimal or asymmetric outcome. Overall, an optimal outcome was found in 19 infants (39%) and nonoptimal outcome in 30 infants (61%), 7 of whom failed on all domains of function. Postural control had a significant influence on the different domains of development such as motility (P .001) and persistent infantile reactions (P .001) and slightly less on hand function (P = .08) and asymmetry (P = .06). The outcome on spontaneous motility was significantly related to the results on infantile reactions (P .005) and hand function (P = .05). Also, the score on the motor scale of the Bayley Developmental test was clearly related to outcome on spontaneous motility (P .001) and reactions ( P .02). Abnormal brain ultrasonograms were related to the asymmetry of the infantile reactions (P .05). Poor coordination of gross motor function will have consequences for appropriate visuomotor and sensorimotor integration, thereby hampering motor learning and later cognitive function, as is often described in preterm infants. It is suggested that the poor postural control found in many infants born preterm is the result of both myogenic and neurogenic deviations caused by the preterm birth and its nursing consequences. (J Child Neurol 2001;16:832—837).

Journal of Child Neurology, Vol. 16, No. 11, 832-837 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/08830738010160110901


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. A. Brumback The Silver Jubilee: Journal of Child Neurology Turns 25 J Child Neurol, January 1, 2010; 25(1): 4 - 31. [PDF]

				J. F. Samsom, L. de Groot, A. Cranendonk, D. Bezemer, H. N. Lafeber, and W. P.F. Fetter Neuromotor Function and School Performance in 7-Year-Old Children Born as High-Risk Preterm Infants J Child Neurol, May 1, 2002; 17(5): 325 - 332. [Abstract] [PDF]