This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Losch, H. Articles by Dammann, O. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Losch, H. Articles by Dammann, O. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Impact of Motor Skills on Cognitive Test Results in Very-Low-Birthweight Children

Neuroepidemiology Unit, Department of Neurology, Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School Boston, MA

Olaf Dammann, MD

Neuroepidemiology Unit, Department of Neurology, Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School Boston, MA, Perinatal Infectious Disease Epidemiology Unit, Department of Obstetrics, Prenatal Medicine and General Gynecology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany, Department of Pediatric Pulmonology and Neonatology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany

Standardized tests that are frequently used to evaluate the cognitive development of very-low-birthweight children often appear to measure motor ability as well as cognitive skills. To estimate the impact of motor skills on individual test performance among very-low-birthweight children of kindergarten age, we employed factor analysis in a sample of 298 very-low-birthweight children that included severely disabled children. Using a test battery designed to measure concentration, language skills, overall cognitive development, visuomotor abilities, and memory, we identified two factors in each of three diagnostic subgroups: unimpaired children (n = 184), clumsy children (n = 56), and children with cerebral palsy (n = 33). Based on the pattern of factor loadings, we interpret the first factor as capturing language and overall cognitive abilities, whereas the second factor appears to capture motor abilities. Language skills explained 49% and motor abilities accounted for 16% of the overall variance of the individual test results. Among children with attention deficit (n = 25), a third factor emerged. In these children, we interpret the first factor as capturing language or cognitive skills, the second as representing visuomotor skills, and the third as a quantifier of the ability to concentrate. The test battery tested the same abilities in impaired and unimpaired children; however, these were not always the abilities that the battery aimed to test. Future studies need to evaluate whether factor scores only for cognitive but not motor abilities might be useful outcome variables. (J Child Neurol 2004;19:318-322).

Journal of Child Neurology, Vol. 19, No. 5, 318-322 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/088307380401900502


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. F. de Kieviet, J. P. Piek, C. S. Aarnoudse-Moens, and J. Oosterlaan Motor Development in Very Preterm and Very Low-Birth-Weight Children From Birth to Adolescence: A Meta-analysis JAMA, November 25, 2009; 302(20): 2235 - 2242. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Marlow, E. M. Hennessy, M. A. Bracewell, D. Wolke, and for the EPICure Study Group Motor and Executive Function at 6 Years of Age After Extremely Preterm Birth Pediatrics, October 1, 2007; 120(4): 793 - 804. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]