This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Stafstrom, C. E. Articles by Dulli, D. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Stafstrom, C. E. Articles by Dulli, D. A. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Serial Headache Drawings by Children With Migraine: Correlation With Clinical Headache Status

Department of Neurology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, Department of Pediatrics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, stafstrom{at}neurology.wisc.edu.

Shira R. Goldenholz, MD

Department of Pediatrics, Tufts-New England Medical Center, Boston, MA

Douglas A. Dulli, MD

Department of Neurology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI

Children's artistic self-depictions of headache provide valuable insights into their experience of pain and aid in the diagnostic differentiation of headache types. In a previous study, we compared the clinical diagnosis (gold standard) and artistic diagnosis of headaches in 226 children. In approximately 90% of cases, the drawing predicted the clinical diagnosis of migraine versus nonmigraine headache correctly. In the present study, we explored whether headache drawings correlate with clinical improvement after treatment in children with migraine headaches followed longitudinally. Children seen in the Pediatric Neurology Clinic with the chief complaint of headache were asked to draw a picture of what their headache feels like. On subsequent clinic visits, children with the clinical diagnosis of migraine were asked to draw another picture depicting their current headache. The two drawings were compared to assess whether there was improvement; this "artistic response" was then correlated with the child's clinical status (ie, whether the headaches were improved clinically). One hundred eleven children (66 girls, 45 boys) participated in the study, with a mean interval of 5.3 ± 2.3 (standard error of the mean) months between the first and second visits. The mean age at the first visit was 11.6 ± 3.1 years. The raters agreed that serial drawings were both improved or both not improved in 99 of the 111 cases (89%; interrater reliability kappa score of 0.767). Fifty-three children had improvements in their headaches and drawings, 3 children had an improved drawing but no clinical headache improvement, 32 children had no improvement in either their drawing or clinical headaches, and 11 children had improved headaches but no improvement in their drawing. The sensitivity of the drawings for clinical improvement was 0.83, and the specificity was 0.91. The predictive value of an improved headache drawing for an improved clinical response was 0.946. There was no correlation between specific treatment modality and artistic response. We concluded that children's headache drawings are a useful adjunct for the diagnosis of headache type and provide valuable insights into their experience of pain. The present data show that headache drawings can be used longitudinally to provide additional information about the clinical course. The technique is simple, inexpensive, and enjoyable for children and can be applied in a variety of clinical settings. (J Child Neurol 2005;20:809—813).

Journal of Child Neurology, Vol. 20, No. 10, 809-813 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/08830738050200100501


CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. Wojaczynska-Stanek, R. Koprowski, Z. Wrobel, and M. Gola Headache in Children's Drawings J Child Neurol, February 1, 2008; 23(2): 184 - 191. [Abstract] [PDF]