Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for FREE ACCESS to this landmark database

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Journal of Child Neurology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bye, A.
Right arrow Articles by Fagan, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bye, A.
Right arrow Articles by Fagan, E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Nerve Conduction Studies of the Sural Nerve in Childhood

Ann Bye, MBBS, FRACP

Children's Hospital, Camperdown, Australia

Elizabeth Fagan, MBBS, FRACP

Children's Hospital, Camperdown, Australia

A study of the sural nerve was undertaken to determine latency to onset and peak, duration of action potential, amplitude, and conduction velocity in 33 children, 1 to 7 years old. Multiple tests per patient resulted in 140 measurements per variable. To determine if the interpatient measurement variation was a significant factor compared to the intrapatient differences, one-way analysis of variance was performed. With each variable the F statistic showed the interpatient variation was significantly different (P < .001) than the intrapatient measurement variation. There was no significant age effect in the latency to onset and peak, the amplitude, and the duration of action potential. The mean value for latency to onset was 2.430 msec, latency to peak 2.997 msec, duration 2.161 msec, and amplitude 8.736 µV. Age was highly significant (P < .001) with conduction velocities calculated using latency to onset (CV1) and latency to peak (CV2), since distance was less in the younger child, according to the formulas: CV1 = 47.29 + 1.96 (age in years) and CV2 = 38.56 + 1.50 (age in years). Using regression analysis, temperature had no significant effect on CV1 or CV2. ( J Child Neurol 1988;3:94-99).

Journal of Child Neurology, Vol. 3, No. 2, 94-99 (1988)
DOI: 10.1177/088307388800300203


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Child NeurolHome page
F. Cai and J. Zhang
Study of Nerve Conduction and Late Responses in Normal Chinese Infants, Children, and Adults
J Child Neurol, January 1, 1997; 12(1): 13 - 18.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Child NeurolHome page
E. Parano, A. Uncini, D. C. De Vivo, and R. E. Lovelace
Electrophysiologic Correlates of Peripheral Nervous System Maturation in Infancy and Childhood
J Child Neurol, October 1, 1993; 8(4): 336 - 338.
[Abstract] [PDF]