SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Child Neurology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Richards, S.
Right arrow Articles by Iannaccone, S. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Richards, S.
Right arrow Articles by Iannaccone, S. T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Dystrophin and DNA Diagnosis in a Large Pediatric Muscle Clinic

Sue Richards, PhD

GeneScreen, Department of Pediatrics

Susan T. Iannaccone, MD

Texas Scottish Rite Hospital, Department of Neurology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX

Eighty-seven unrelated patients from a large muscle clinic setting were analyzed by DNA for deletions in the dystrophin gene for diagnosis of Duchenne/Becker muscular dystrophy. The clinical phenotype of the patient population included 72% Duchenne, 13% Becker, and 15% outlier patients. Dystrophin gene deletions were detected in 61% of these patients, and disease phenotype was predicted by DNA with an accuracy of 95%. While DNA did not confirm diagnosis in all patients, dystrophin analysis of muscle biopsies, when available, predicted a disease phenotype. In the 66 patients in which muscle biopsies were available for analysis, the results of the dystrophin analysis agreed with actual clinical phenotype with 86% accuracy. Less agreement between dystrophin and clinical phenotype predictions were found in the Becker patient population. We suggest that, in at least 61% of Duchenne/Becker patients, DNA analysis provides a rapid and accurate diagnosis. DNA is less invasive and less expensive than biopsy and may allow family risk assessment. Therefore, DNA analysis may become the first recommended laboratory procedure for Duchenne/Becker diagnosis, and muscle biopsy with dystrophin analysis may become necessary only for those patients with undetectable gene mutations. (J Child Neurol 1994;9:162-166).

Journal of Child Neurology, Vol. 9, No. 2, 162-166 (1994)
DOI: 10.1177/088307389400900211


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Child NeurolHome page
F. J. Samaha and J. G. Quinlan
Topical Review: Dystrophinopathies: Clarification and Complication
J Child Neurol, January 1, 1996; 11(1): 13 - 20.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Advertisement